top of page

Understanding the Role of Polygraph Examinations in Relationships

Writer's picture: Chris BrooksChris Brooks

Polygraph examinations, commonly referred to as lie detector tests, are powerful tools used in various contexts, including criminal investigations, employee screenings, and personal relationships.


At Arizona Lie Detection, we often encounter inquiries about polygraph tests related to relationship issues, particularly infidelity. While these tests can be valuable in rebuilding trust, it’s important to understand their purpose, limitations, and ethical considerations.


This article addresses key concerns surrounding polygraphs in relationships, including the examiner’s role, the proper use of polygraphs, and the importance of consent.




The Examiner’s Role: Objectivity and Limitations


One of the most misunderstood aspects of polygraph testing is the role of the examiner. Examiners are trained professionals who administer polygraphs to assess physiological responses such as heart rate, breathing, and perspiration when an individual answers specific questions. These responses are analyzed using scientifically established methods to determine whether the person’s answers are truthful.


However, it is crucial to recognize that examiners are not mind readers or clairvoyants. They do not possess a “crystal ball” to determine why someone may pass or fail a polygraph test. In modern technology, we have advanced computerized polygraphs and artificial intelligence that can score at a high degree of accuracy. However, like any machine, not God.


Why Pass or Fail?


• A “pass” or “fail” result is based strictly on the physiological data collected during the test and analyzed using a scoring system. The results reflect whether the individual exhibited significant physiological responses to relevant questions, which could indicate deception.


Examiners cannot provide personal interpretations of why someone may have failed or passed the test. Emotional factors, nervousness, or incomplete disclosure of relevant information can influence results.


• For this reason, contacting the examiner for further explanations about why someone passed or failed is not appropriate. Their conclusions are solely based on the physiological data and the questions asked, without any room for subjective interpretation.


If additional context or insight is needed, it is best to discuss the results with the person who took the test, as they are the only ones who can clarify the truth behind their responses.


Polygraph Examinations and Consent: Voluntary, Not Coercive


A polygraph should never be used as a weapon or ultimatum in a relationship. Forcing someone to take a polygraph under the threat of ending the relationship is both unethical and counterproductive.


The Role of Consent


• A polygraph is only effective when the individual taking it does so willingly and without coercion. Someone forced into taking a polygraph may feel intense stress, which can compromise the test’s accuracy.


• If a spouse is threatening to end a marriage or relationship unless the other person submits to a polygraph, it undermines the integrity of the test.


The test should be approached as a tool to facilitate healing and trust, not as a punishment or control mechanism.


At Arizona Lie Detection, we emphasize the importance of consent and ensure that all participants clearly understand the purpose of the polygraph before proceeding.


Infidelity Polygraphs: When and Why They’re Appropriate


Infidelity polygraphs are among the most common requests we receive. However, it’s important to understand that these tests are not a “quick fix” for relationship problems.


Instead, they are best used in specific scenarios:


1. To Confirm Full Disclosure:


• An infidelity polygraph is most effective when the individual taking it has already come clean about any past mistakes or dishonest behavior. The polygraph then serves as a way to validate that no additional information is being withheld.


2. To Address Evidence of Dishonesty:


• If there is credible evidence or suspicion of infidelity, and the accused partner voluntarily offers to take a polygraph to prove their innocence, the test can provide clarity.


What Infidelity Polygraphs Are NOT For:


• Polygraphs should never be used in the absence of credible concerns or evidence. They are not a tool to satisfy baseless paranoia or control a partner.


• Forcing a partner to “prove” their loyalty with a polygraph in the absence of any wrongdoing creates an unhealthy dynamic and undermines the trust needed for any successful relationship.


Setting Realistic Expectations


Polygraphs, while highly reliable, are not infallible. According to the American Polygraph Association (APA), the accuracy of polygraph testing is approximately 85-95%. However, the results are not definitive proof of guilt or innocence; rather, they provide additional information to help guide decision-making.


What a Polygraph Can and Cannot Do:


It can:


• Help rebuild trust by confirming truthful statements.

• Offer clarity in situations where evidence suggests dishonesty.


It cannot:


• Repair a relationship on its own. Trust, communication, and mutual effort are also required.

• Determine the “why” behind someone’s behavior.


Final Thoughts


Polygraph tests can be valuable tools for addressing infidelity and other relationship concerns, but they should always be approached with caution, understanding, and respect for all parties involved.


At Arizona Lie Detection, we prioritize professionalism, objectivity, and ethical standards in all our polygraph services.


If you’re considering a polygraph as part of your relationship journey, ensure that it is approached as a voluntary process, with clear communication and realistic expectations.


Remember, a polygraph cannot solve relationship issues on its own—but it can be a step toward clarity and healing.


For more information about our services or to schedule a polygraph, contact Arizona Lie Detection today.


Sources and Further Reading:

• American Polygraph Association (APA)

• National Center for Credibility Assessment (NCCA): Training and Standards in Polygraphy

• Handler, M., & Nelson, R. (2010). “Polygraph Testing and Its Role in Relationships,” APA Journal.

14 views0 comments

Comments


Commenting has been turned off.
bottom of page